Thread

1. rapnie · 1789548419 · focus · HN ↗

   The other day in a Dutch geopolitics podcast (Boekestijn en de Wijk) it was mentioned that if there's one country that could be added to the EU "at the stroke of a pen", it would be Canada. In terms of state of the democracy, shared values, etc. And I agree with that perspective. But at the same time I thought that if there's one way to get into conflict with the current US administration - who declared EU their only adversary in the US National Security Plan - this is it. It would be like a mirror image of Russia feeling encroached by NATO, but then in the Western hemisphere. And perhaps a red cloth invitation to the frothing bull(ies) of the Trump administration to invade their neighbor.

   1. WinstonSmith84 · 1789548729 · focus · HN ↗

      The US-Iran war is very unpopular and it's not even that the US is winning it.

      Going against Canada would mean .. what? Having tanks roll in Toronto downtown? Assuming it would be a military success, which isn't guaranteed after what happens in Iran,that would be unpopular beyond anything we've seen.

      Tough words, that's the worse we may expect from the US gov realistically.

      1. rapnie · 1789549956 · focus · HN ↗

         > Tough words, that's the worse we may expect from the US gov realistically.

         Trade wars and sanctions can get very nasty too. I don't know about Canada, but most of the EU runs on US Big Tech to name just one sensitive sector.

         1. Lio · 1789562481 · focus · HN ↗

            > I don't know about Canada, but most of the EU runs on US Big Tech to name just one sensitive sector.

            That's true, right now. The way things are going though the EU is spurred to finally cut the cord with US Big Tech because of the security risk.

            It didn't used to be like that before Trump got into power. Trump is bad for business because he's an unreliable partner that's turning on his allies.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.