Thread

1. tazjin · 1789503947 · focus · HN ↗

   I don't think that this produces correct results, as it seems to determine whether each individual number is Numberwang. However, whether a number is Numberwang can also depend on the previous numbers in the sequence or other factors.

   So I think as it stands right now this model can only determine whether a number would be Numberwang as the first number of a sequence, but even for that I still wouldn't rely on this in the actual game show.

   1. wrs · 1789504100 · focus · HN ↗

      Do we really know that? Or have we only seen the sequences from people searching for Numberwang? Has a number been both Numberwang (or Wangernumb) and not Numberwang (or Wangernumb)?

      1. tazjin · 1789505679 · focus · HN ↗

         Yeah, we do - there's a famous episode where after rotating the board both contestants stubbornly kept picking 1, and after a couple of iterations one of them was Wangernumb.

         1. debugnik · 1789511014 · focus · HN ↗

            I can confirm this is the first episode, which I just watched since I had no idea about Numberwang until a minute ago. So I guess a true Numberwang fan would know that.

            1. gaigalas · 1789516986 · focus · HN ↗

               Obviously, it depends on whether board has rotated or not. It seems the model doesn't support board rotation yet, so the result is consistent with the limited set of features.

               1. Scaled · 1789552617 · focus · HN ↗

                  Also you must factor in what's behind the board!

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.