Wasn't really till seeing this home assistant demo they have (<a href="https://www.loom.com/share/18c4dbcf8db546dfb2d7f2ef018e78e4" rel="nofollow">https://www.loom.com/share/18c4dbcf8db546dfb2d7f2ef018e78e4) that the value really clicked for me.
Guess I'm a bit less impressed seeing that for some of the more intelligent driven+action work -- splitting requests in the video -- they had to kick out to an anthropic model.
Haiku, to rewrite a sentence as two discreet commands.
I agree that it was notable that they delegated to an existing LLM, but I don't think it detracts much from the value proposition (not yet proven) of their demo.
Agreed but is it much easier to deal with if you need to have all of these sub processes integrated? How does one know when you need to reword a request? What if Anthropic then has a type error, then debugging that just got harder.
cfowles · · focus · HN ↗
Seems really cool.
ramoz · · focus · HN ↗
kzsh · · focus · HN ↗
I agree that it was notable that they delegated to an existing LLM, but I don't think it detracts much from the value proposition (not yet proven) of their demo.
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
alpineman · · focus · HN ↗