Thanks for the early access! I was testing the Lisp idea out in the playground, but I don't think the model is smart enough right now to generate actual code. I tried having Jev finish generating the code for a Fibonacci number function, but it kept wanting to create a literal number instead of refer to a variable which is a number. This happened both when I gave Jev the current program as a string and when I gave Jev the program as structured data.
Maybe I'm just not doing a very good job at prompting Jev, but I think right now it's not quite capable enough to generate Lisp code.
cooljoseph · · focus · HN ↗
1. Do you provide any kind of largest common subtree caching for cheaper input?
2. Have you tried auto-generating Lisp programs structurally?
3. Have you tried augmenting a Lisp language with a `choice` function that makes choices given a prompt, the environment, and the continuation stack?
zenlikethat · · focus · HN ↗
(2-3) No, but that's kind of a sick cook ... Want to get access and try it? nathan@typesafe.ai
cooljoseph · · focus · HN ↗
Maybe I'm just not doing a very good job at prompting Jev, but I think right now it's not quite capable enough to generate Lisp code.
Link: <a href="https://console.typesafe.ai/playground?share=shr_148e12489842722475aae69a35758ccb0c5" rel="nofollow">https://console.typesafe.ai/playground?share=shr_148e1248984...