‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Chopping up books when they're physically too big

229 points · 211 comments · matt_kirkland

  1. spudlyo · · focus · HN ↗
    This seems like a lot of work for not a huge payoff. I get that the feel and experience of a physical book has a certain nostalgia, but for me, I'd just leave the big monster on the shelf and grab an epub from Anna's Archive. You have already ensured the author and publisher get paid, you might as well read on an e-reader, which is in my opinion superior in nearly every way to a physical book.

    Ebooks sync across devices, allow for a customized presentation, quick dictionary lookups, bookmarks, etc. The only slight edge I'll give to a physical book is the ability to easily make marginal notes in pencil -- I realize that ebooks have this feature too, it's just not as immediate or as frictionless.

    1. stronglikedan · · focus · HN ↗
      The problem with ebooks is that you cannot be 100% certain that you're reading the original text. That can only be preserved in physical copies. That's why the destructive book scanning for AI is such a tragedy. There's already plenty of examples of original texts being surreptitiously revised, and it happens with videos too.
      1. WalterBright · · focus · HN ↗
        I was shocked to discover that "How To Win Friends and Influence People" by Dale Carnegie was heavily rewritten by his wife after his death. I had two copies of the book, and sure enough, one was the old version and the other the new. The new one did not withstand scrutiny.
        1. vintagedave · · focus · HN ↗
          May I ask: what was different? This is the first time I’ve heard of this and I’ve only seen what was, likely, the new edition.
          1. WalterBright · · focus · HN ↗
            My original copy was printed in 1977. His wife's version that I have was printed in 1981.

            Parts V and VI were removed from the wife's version.

            1. HelloMcFly · · focus · HN ↗
              The removed sections:

              1. Letters That Produced Miraculous Results - cut because correspondence norms had massively changed between 1936 and 1981

              2. Seven Rules for Making Your Home Life Happier - cut because its 1930s-era perspectives on marriage and domestic life didn't age that well

              Personally, I think some of the edits in the remaining sections are more controversial than the removal of those two sections. I think the revision lost quite a bit of Dale's charm and just felt a bit less idiosyncratic in a bad way.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.