‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Chopping up books when they're physically too big

229 points · 211 comments · matt_kirkland

  1. spudlyo · · focus · HN ↗
    This seems like a lot of work for not a huge payoff. I get that the feel and experience of a physical book has a certain nostalgia, but for me, I'd just leave the big monster on the shelf and grab an epub from Anna's Archive. You have already ensured the author and publisher get paid, you might as well read on an e-reader, which is in my opinion superior in nearly every way to a physical book.

    Ebooks sync across devices, allow for a customized presentation, quick dictionary lookups, bookmarks, etc. The only slight edge I'll give to a physical book is the ability to easily make marginal notes in pencil -- I realize that ebooks have this feature too, it's just not as immediate or as frictionless.

    1. NoahZuniga · · focus · HN ↗
      This post isn't aimed at people that read a physical book for "nostalgia". They read a lot of books and have already decided that they prefer physical books to an ereader.
      1. shevy-java · · focus · HN ↗
        That makes no sense to me though. I always prefer physical books to any ereader, but I still stopped accumulating (new) books in my flat - they just accumulate space. I'll always love hardcopy books, but not needing them as a physical hardcopy is just better for me.
        1. al_borland · · focus · HN ↗
          You seem to be optimizing for storage space, while others are optimizing for their preferred reading experience.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.