Then... don't? If it sucks so much why do you need to read the tweets?
Great take: "This private website is owned by a man I don't like, so I refuse to pay for it - or even give it the possibility to monetize my traffic with ads!"
Still quite mainstream take: "... so I'll use an adblocker on it"
Immature take: "This private website that I hate and boycott is also an important part of our culture, but the posts on it are too important and valuable to ignore, so I'll use a proxy to scrape it"
I didn't say Twitter is a society, and it doesn't need to be.
The joke in the comic is "Mr. Gotcha" trying to counter a desire by people to change things, by pointing out that those people participate in those things. Could be society, could be Twitter, could be anything. The comic takes this
common internet argument to its logical extreme. The takeaway is that participating in something doesn't actually detract from efforts to change it.
Also, to think that I, one person, can give or withdraw any of twitter's power is a silly proposition.
No one is upset that the AI companies are scraping the web, they’re upset how poorly implemented the scrapers, but the scraping itself is fine. Lots of people and businesses scrape the web.
Copyright, patent, and trademark law. The LLM firms misappropriated $9Tn of FOSS community work, ignored the license terms, and resell isomorphic plagiarism tokens to people getting farmed for more data.
If you still don't understand, than you don't understand how LLM are made.
Just because something is publicly accessible doesn't mean it is Public Domain. Having hosting people pay for the bots stolen bandwidth (or DDoS), is also theft of service under the law. =3
swingandamiss · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
dallen33 · · focus · HN ↗
qwerpy · · focus · HN ↗
Feels good when you get to dish it out doesn’t it?
mitxela · · focus · HN ↗
xp84 · · focus · HN ↗
Great take: "This private website is owned by a man I don't like, so I refuse to pay for it - or even give it the possibility to monetize my traffic with ads!"
Still quite mainstream take: "... so I'll use an adblocker on it"
Immature take: "This private website that I hate and boycott is also an important part of our culture, but the posts on it are too important and valuable to ignore, so I'll use a proxy to scrape it"
ImPostingOnHN · · focus · HN ↗
Some of the content is good, the site sucks and is run by a guy who seig-heils crowds.
Even if the content sucked, your post has big "you want to improve `X`, yet you participate in `X`"[0] energy.
0 – <a href="https://kitzy.com/content/assets/images/we-should-improve-society.png" rel="nofollow">https://kitzy.com/content/assets/images/we-should-improve-so...
xp84 · · focus · HN ↗
ImPostingOnHN · · focus · HN ↗
The joke in the comic is "Mr. Gotcha" trying to counter a desire by people to change things, by pointing out that those people participate in those things. Could be society, could be Twitter, could be anything. The comic takes this common internet argument to its logical extreme. The takeaway is that participating in something doesn't actually detract from efforts to change it.
Also, to think that I, one person, can give or withdraw any of twitter's power is a silly proposition.
slig · · focus · HN ↗
kg · · focus · HN ↗
faefox · · focus · HN ↗
righthand · · focus · HN ↗
akerl_ · · focus · HN ↗
righthand · · focus · HN ↗
Joel_Mckay · · focus · HN ↗
If you still don't understand, than you don't understand how LLM are made.
Just because something is publicly accessible doesn't mean it is Public Domain. Having hosting people pay for the bots stolen bandwidth (or DDoS), is also theft of service under the law. =3
mitxela · · focus · HN ↗
yifanl · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
knowaveragejoe · · focus · HN ↗
MadameMinty · · focus · HN ↗