- "how much things they postpone to put into v11 ?"
- "moving to stack is faster then heap"
- so.. why they just not use multiple stacks ?? ring buffers are just progressive stack but plain stack is just pointer moving... Hmm, but what is usecase except recursive function calling ?
- ok, I read that articele
- what ? it's just a first part ??
- async thingies
- "state machines looks like that"
- aha, always wanted to konw that, thank you Microsoft! Wait, what?? What I just said ?? That really happened?
- scroll, then scroll more some asm code, maybe I read it later
- something interesting, don't remeber now
- next morning coffee time: O, I have some more to read, maybe I can learn something more ?
- ok, work time but probably will finish reading later today
So it is realy nice article. I learned how to do old-school async wrappers in plain C :)
someguynamedq · · focus · HN ↗
Woodi · · focus · HN ↗
My reading was like this:
- "how much things they postpone to put into v11 ?"
- "moving to stack is faster then heap"
- so.. why they just not use multiple stacks ?? ring buffers are just progressive stack but plain stack is just pointer moving... Hmm, but what is usecase except recursive function calling ?
- ok, I read that articele
- what ? it's just a first part ??
- async thingies
- "state machines looks like that"
- aha, always wanted to konw that, thank you Microsoft! Wait, what?? What I just said ?? That really happened?
- scroll, then scroll more some asm code, maybe I read it later
- something interesting, don't remeber now
- next morning coffee time: O, I have some more to read, maybe I can learn something more ?
- ok, work time but probably will finish reading later today
So it is realy nice article. I learned how to do old-school async wrappers in plain C :)