It would be clearer if the operation were part of the name. The most common operations have good names, like sum(), product(), concat(), and so on.If there's no standard function for it, it's trivial to write a utility function.And as part of writing the function, give it a good name and think a bit about the order of operations?So I think reduce() is just unnecessarily generic, unless it's part of a more complicated system like running a map-reduce.
skybrian · · focus · HN ↗
If there's no standard function for it, it's trivial to write a utility function.
And as part of writing the function, give it a good name and think a bit about the order of operations?
So I think reduce() is just unnecessarily generic, unless it's part of a more complicated system like running a map-reduce.