‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

The Beauty of Roundabouts

100 points · 222 comments · ngruhn

  1. propter_hoc · · focus · HN ↗
    My best friend is a highly experienced civil engineer, specialized in designing intersections. His take on roundabouts:

    - They are adored by urban planners because they look nice and you can put a statue or fountain in the middle

    - They reduce T-bone collisions

    However:

    - Small fender benders and sideswipes are much more frequent

    - They use way more area

    - They work where each direction has an approximately equal amount of traffic. However, usually, one direction (north/south, say) has a larger share of the traffic. In those cases, the bulk of traffic all needs to slow down, downshift, turn a bit in one direction and then turn a bit in the other direction for the minority of traffic that's bleeding on or off the main artery. In those cases, a traffic light is better because the timing can be adjusted to the proportion of traffic from each direction (and more flexible since it can be adjusted over time).

    - Finally, they're also (mostly) worse for cyclists and pedestrians.

    Essentially, they have use cases, especially in small towns, and they're pretty, but they're usually not the right engineering solution.

    1. jwr · · focus · HN ↗
      > Small fender benders and sideswipes are much more frequent

      Do you have any data on this? Everything I've ever read about them points to exactly the opposite conclusion. They actually reduce accidents and by a significant margin.

      My only guess would be that you are referring to the US, where people are not used to roundabouts and yielding without a STOP sign.

      1. [deleted] · · focus · HN ↗

        [deleted]

      2. lokar · · focus · HN ↗
        Everything I’ve seen says minor collisions (without injury) go up and injury accidents go down.

        A good trade

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.