Thread

1. embedding-shape · 1786043690 · focus · HN ↗

   Strange that the page <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;agents&#x2F;coding-agents" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;agents&#x2F;coding-agents doesn&#x27;t even mention &quot;Qwen&quot; once if it&#x27;s now the &quot;best&quot; according to one of their one index?

   1. Bootvis · 1786044058 · focus · HN ↗

      Indeed, and this Qwen 3.8 max specific page:

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;qwen3-8-max" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;qwen3-8-max

      Doesn&#x27;t have the claim either. Clickbait?

      1. petu · 1786044252 · focus · HN ↗

         This page has it, scroll to &quot;Intelligence&quot; header (not the highlights one, but second on the page &#x2F; with black square) and click &quot;Agentic Index&quot;

         1. Bootvis · 1786044643 · focus · HN ↗

            So the original link should be: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;qwen3-8-max?intelligence=agentic-index" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&#x2F;models&#x2F;qwen3-8-max?intelligenc...

            Even then, this seems a much more marginal win than the headline suggested to me.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.