Thread

1. ElijahLynn · 1786044531 · focus · HN ↗

   I can't wait to never see a reasoning button ever again. Why do I have to reason about what reasoning level to use?

   1. skybrian · 1786045337 · focus · HN ↗

      Some people want quick results. Some people want it to keep searching for a new math proof overnight without giving up, and they have money to burn.

      It seems like giving it a time limit or a budget in dollars would be clearer, though?

      Or, keep searching until I come back to the computer and ask about progress.

      1. pllbnk · 1786045816 · focus · HN ↗

         The _Intelligence_ part of AGI should be able to guide the user through that without all the knobs.

         1. vanuatu · 1786046224 · focus · HN ↗

            intelligence is not omniscience though

            1. stymaar · 1786053175 · focus · HN ↗

               Asking questions to clarify user intent is a very low bar for intelligence. A bar that all SOTA models fail consistently. (It's both funny and legit infuriating when Opus, after having made a dozen wild assumptions without checking with you, then comes back with a request for clarification on some mundane topic).

               1. vanuatu · 1786062695 · focus · HN ↗

                  but you can keep asking questions ad infinitum

                  very nontrivial problem knowing when to stop and making assumptions

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.