‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

A handful of cities have replaced Flock with Axon

92 points · 41 comments · cdrnsf

  1. wxw · · focus · HN ↗
    > One key feature of Flock is its national lookup tool.

    > Axon, simply, does not have a national network. Meaning that it would not be possible for cops in one jurisdiction to search cameras across the country. > Police departments using Axon can enter into data sharing agreements with each other, though.

    > Denver, just like the City of Ferndale, explicitly mentioned this lack of this national network as part of its decision to ditch Flock for Axon.

    This (probably alongside all the bad press Flock has gotten) appears to be the crux of the switching. Ultimately, the tech actually being deployed seems similar.

    Also interesting:

    > One reason why journalists, activists, and residents have been able to learn so much about what police use Flock for is that the company has built auditing tools that the public can access through records requests.

    1. gilthelander · · focus · HN ↗
      What is the point of ALPRs if not for the database capability? To prove small town Sally the real estate agent is cheating with Bill the bank manager?
      1. zeeveener · · focus · HN ↗
        It forces a paper trail of warrants and other "official" pathways that we would normally consider proper policing.

        If another district wants to ask a question, they have to follow the appropriate chain of command and use the correct tools.

        Flock appears to have been a way for them to work around all of that and just answer any question they had willy-nilly.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.