‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

A handful of cities have replaced Flock with Axon

96 points · 43 comments · cdrnsf

  1. wxw · · focus · HN ↗
    > One key feature of Flock is its national lookup tool.

    > Axon, simply, does not have a national network. Meaning that it would not be possible for cops in one jurisdiction to search cameras across the country. > Police departments using Axon can enter into data sharing agreements with each other, though.

    > Denver, just like the City of Ferndale, explicitly mentioned this lack of this national network as part of its decision to ditch Flock for Axon.

    This (probably alongside all the bad press Flock has gotten) appears to be the crux of the switching. Ultimately, the tech actually being deployed seems similar.

    Also interesting:

    > One reason why journalists, activists, and residents have been able to learn so much about what police use Flock for is that the company has built auditing tools that the public can access through records requests.

    1. FireBeyond · · focus · HN ↗
      How long before Axon turns data sharing "opt out"?

      > One reason why journalists, activists, and residents have been able to learn so much about what police use Flock for is that the company has built auditing tools that the public can access through records requests.

      As someone else says, "in theory". Also of note, their "Transparency Portal" is... not. I know of at least three agencies in my County who are using Flock who are not listed on the Transparency Portal...

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.