‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Almost no skill required to cook a steak

220 points · 254 comments · yusyd

  1. MostlyStable · · focus · HN ↗
    I take the point, but I think the author picked a poor analogy. Cooking even an excellent steak is actually not that hard. In fact, I'd argue that it's among the easiest things to master/make at a top level quality at home. Does it require some modicum of attention and understanding? Sure. But starting with a high quality cut, owning a meat-thermometer, and knowing about reverse searing is about all it takes to reliably and easily get a near perfect steak every time.

    There are far, far better cooking examples out there.

    1. MerrimanInd · · focus · HN ↗
      I'm more of a coffee nerd than a steak aficionado but I've often made the comparison between those two. In both cases, the enthusiast considers their skill in making coffee/cooking steak to be a differentiator and they immerse themselves deeply into the process, skills, and tools. But for both coffee beans and steak the most important factor for a good end product is starting with high quality inputs. In other words, most of the work is being done by the farmers, the processors, and the quality of the raw stock (the cow or the coffee plant). Your job at the very end of that long value adding chain is to not ruin the hard work that others have put into it.

      I'm not sure if this analogy holds up in the AI software metaphor that the author of the blog post is making.

      1. jaggederest · · focus · HN ↗
        Coffee is a good metaphor here too, because bad technique can ruin a good steak just as surely as good coffee. "knows how to use a meat thermometer and reverse sear" describes like 10% of the population or less, same with coffee - there are people who use a bad grinder and a not-regularly-cleaned Mr. Coffee with good beans and get gas station coffee, and there are people out there making solidly B+ class coffee using costco beans, a no name burr grinder, and a french press.

        Edit for people who've never had good coffee:

        &quot;I don&#x27;t like coffee. Can James Hoffmann change that?&quot; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Z-iNAyu-ejo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Z-iNAyu-ejo

        1. cogman10 · · focus · HN ↗
          Perhaps I&#x27;m crazy, but I truly can&#x27;t taste much of a difference between &quot;good&quot; coffee and &quot;bad&quot; coffee.

          I can certainly tell the difference between a good steak and a bad one.

          1. whythismatters · · focus · HN ↗
            Believe me, there&#x27;s a huge spectrum, from the sweet aroma of freshly ground Brazilian beans to straight up cat piss coffee sold in supermarkets.
            1. konart · · focus · HN ↗
              No offence, but for some reason some people just can&#x27;t accept a simple fact: for some people this difference is still not a difference.

              I&#x27;ve tried good coffee. At least that&#x27;s what people told ne on multiple accasions where I was taken to &quot;the right places&quot; in multiple countries. On two sides of the globe (Brazil and Vietnam if we are talking about producers, not to mention countries that import the beans).

              Thing is: no matter where it grows, no matter how they prepare it, fermented or not, different frying, different brewing techniques - all the same to me.

              I can tell the difference. Some times small, some times very huge. But still for this difference is like a cat piss from some street cat and a cat with a pedigree.

              It may have the ideal temperature, ideal acid levels, zinc amounts or whatever - still tastes like cat piss. The fact that it has a pedigree does not make it better.

              Tea is whole different story for me though. But I do accepts that people are fine with whatever they love in their &quot;english breakfast tea&quot; or a nameless teabag.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.