‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Zed DeltaDB

514 points · 298 comments · ahamez

  1. hi5ato · · focus · HN ↗
    VSCode is great, but its lack of a sandbox for extensions makes it extremely vulnerable to supply chain attacks. Zed is one of the few major editors that isolates plugins, which is why I like it. However, it has far too many bugs.

    Regarding DeltaDB’s request to 'log conversations and changes together', I think the Linux kernel's development model — which combines mailing lists, patch exchanges and Git — provides a good solution.

    I suspect that, to secure funding or land enterprise contracts, they need to showcase a “showcase” project like DeltaDB, but I believe they also want to focus on the core parts of the editor.

    --- I wrote the original text, but I had an LLM polish it, so there are em dashes in it

    1. gcr · · focus · HN ↗
      The problem with combining mailing lists, patch exchanges, and Git is that you have to combine mailing lists, patch exchanges, and Git.

      Most projects are not created under those conditions.

    2. chiffaa · · focus · HN ↗
      I wouldn't really say DeltaDB is a showcase project, given Zed has been working on it for at least a year, so it's likely been a focal point of development for quite some time. If there is funding to secure, they either should've been louder on the initial announcement, or not thrown a year on this, right?
      1. hi5ato · · focus · HN ↗
        I missed that the announcement was actually from two months ago.

        It will be interesting to see how they handle balancing both an editor and a VCS without Big Tech resources like Microsoft's. Considering how many contributions and years it took for Git to reach its current level of maturity, taking on both projects seems like a massive undertaking.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.