‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Zed DeltaDB

514 points · 299 comments · ahamez

  1. drdexebtjl · · focus · HN ↗
    This makes me uncomfortable.

    Maybe I’m pessimistic, but I think this just gives micro-managers the data they need to micro-manage you. It invites people to scrutinize the process, instead of the results.

    Not once have I wished to review a colleague’s conversation with an AI. I want to review finished work.

    I look at this and I can only imagine layoffs being justified with “bad prompt quality”. An incident retrospective broadcasting your agent conversations to the entire company, with people speculating where you should have put the “make no mistakes”.

    It’s a shame, really, because I like Zed as an editor, but I can’t bring myself to support them if this is the direction they’re choosing.

    1. mcintyre1994 · · focus · HN ↗
      The sort of company that would do those things is going to be mandating you to use their enterprise AI plan anyway, which already lets them read all your conversations if they want to.
      1. drdexebtjl · · focus · HN ↗
        Letting them read my conversations is okay. Systematically reconstructing a timeline of every keystroke that went into a project, then immortalizing this timeline into a VCS, that’s the creepy part.

        I suppose companies could do this anyway just by installing spyware in your work computer, but I would very much prefer if that spyware was not my editor of choice.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.