‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Zed DeltaDB

514 points · 299 comments · ahamez

  1. g42gregory · · focus · HN ↗
    Looks like a great feature/product/functionality. I hope that Zed editor will make it work with LLMs/agents that run in the terminal, not just the Zen Agent itself. Is it even possible? I use OMP.sh agent running in Zed terminal.
    1. randomblock1 · · focus · HN ↗
      It supports anything with ACP. So it can actually run Codex and Claude Code, not just the Zed Agent.

      Looks like omp supports ACP, so all you have to do is specify a Custom Agent in Zed and it should just work.

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;omp.sh&#x2F;docs&#x2F;acp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;omp.sh&#x2F;docs&#x2F;acp

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;zed.dev&#x2F;docs&#x2F;ai&#x2F;external-agents" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;zed.dev&#x2F;docs&#x2F;ai&#x2F;external-agents

      1. ok_dad · · focus · HN ↗
        This is the killer Zed feature, IMO, that they support almost any agent via extensions. I deleted Cursor but still use the agent via Zed because it’s a lot nicer experience, Zed never had popups telling me Grok is half off. I also use OpenRouter and Zed.dev with it, that’s three providers out of dozens that it supports.
        1. vehemenz · · focus · HN ↗
          Exactly. The more competitive the space is, the more important it is that products purposefully support 3rd-party providers. Now that people are increasingly switching from Anthropic&#x2F;OpenAI for inference reseellers and on-prem compute, transparency and portability will be the new values, not being slightly better than the next agent or model.
        2. stusmall · · focus · HN ↗
          Even more than supporting any agent that support almost anything period. They seem to take the default approach of using open community standards first when adding new features. By investing very heavily in LSP, ACP, DAP, tree-sitter etc it makes it easy for Zed to integrate with tons of different workflows, language, ecosystems etc quickly and easily. Its just good engineering and I love to see it.
      2. fireant · · focus · HN ↗
        Using OMP through ACP inside Zed is drastically worse experience than just running OMP inside Zed terminal. The ACP UI is dreadful and I had bunch of crashes even for first party Codex support.
        1. g42gregory · · focus · HN ↗
          Yeah, I saw the same thing. I will try the terminal threads that a poster above has mentioned. It sounds very interesting.
    2. joemccall86 · · focus · HN ↗
      I use this every day — <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;zed.dev&#x2F;blog&#x2F;terminal-threads" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;zed.dev&#x2F;blog&#x2F;terminal-threads
      1. g42gregory · · focus · HN ↗
        This looks very promising.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.