‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Born Against, or why hobby programming communities are against LLM usage

391 points · 454 comments · lladnar

  1. VCFundedGenYer · · focus · HN ↗
    This is a case of an SV-brained person stepping outside the bubble and realizing that LLMs are not the universal savior they think it is.

    AI isn't well liked in a lot of places. I agree with the communities - make something yourself, don't ask a robot to do it for you. If you vibe slop something into existence, I'm never going to look at it. Something you made yourself though? Hell yeah I want to see it.

    Another example is the art community - use AI/LLMs there, you'll be excommunicated.

    1. spijdar · · focus · HN ↗
      Here's my thoughts as a 29 year old: of all the things I've ever made in my personal life, the vast majority have ended up abandoned in barely worked on states, and those I have put varying degrees of significant effort in have gone unnoticed. I've never really been able to "enter" a community in a way that felt meaningful to me, either, when I've tried.

      I say this not as a complaint, but to explain my perspective on using LLMs for personal projects. Granted, I'm publishing none of them, and not trying to make anyone care about them, so it's not really a response to the article or general discourse here per se, but I thought it bears mentioning anyway.

      I'd like to buy into the idea that "doing it yourself" is more meaningful or personally edifying, but I don't get that feeling. I want to get that feeling, but I don't. I've found my private waste-of-time projects using LLMs have been more gratifying than my private waste-of-time projects that don't, and at the end of the day, neither really substantively matter anyway.

      Again, this isn't really related to communities per se, but it is an answer why some folks use LLMs for projects/"hobbies".

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.