Show HN: Run an 80B Qwen in 4.3 GB of RAM on a Mac, and a 35B on an iPhone
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Show HN: Run an 80B Qwen in 4.3 GB of RAM on a Mac, and a 35B on an iPhone
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
AHASIC · · focus · HN ↗
Mistletoe · · focus · HN ↗
CircuitSeuss · · focus · HN ↗
Apple has worked very hard to make unified memory a feasible approach, and the benefits of that are pretty clear in apple silicon- that efficiency not only results in power and therefore thermal gains, but also in a significantly faster full loop per process: or a faster time to token. This is why even their single core mobile chips in the budget line Neo out perform PC processors with several times more threads and RAM[1]. Turns out, unified memory lets you have a whole lot more control over things like RAM bussing and core use for specific workflows.
Speculatively, a unified memory approach could also allow you to more easily integrate things like ReRAM to solve the current memory swapping bottleneck.
Let’s say a friend of mine works hardware at apple and works on exactly this… on device processing is the future I’m betting on.
[1] <a href="https://youtu.be/x26A28DoT-w?t=605" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/x26A28DoT-w?t=605
ac29 · · focus · HN ↗
Unified memory has existed for decades in the PC space, Apple didnt invent it.
And the test you linked to has nothing to do with unified memory, its a web browser benchmark (almost entirely constrained by single threaded CPU performance that Apple better than competitors at).