‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Show HN: ssh ssh.place

184 points · 119 comments · jeninh

  1. 3dedb728-3f77 · · focus · HN ↗
    Hey, is it not just a simple honeypot reverse hack ssh server?

    People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right?

    1. scubbo · · focus · HN ↗
      > People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right?

      No, actually, I've never heard of such a vector. How would that work?

      1. jerrythegerbil · · focus · HN ↗
        An ssh server would exploit a vulnerability in the ssh client when it connects.

        For example, openssh has both a client and server. There’s been vulnerabilities in openssh, in the client. Those vulnerabilities aren’t reachable unless you’re connecting to a server attempting to exploit you, so the risk is quite low because you know and trust most servers you’re connecting to with ssh.

        To sum it up: Connecting to this server is probably fine, but in doing so most people are doing something significantly riskier without realizing it.

        1. applfanboysbgon · · focus · HN ↗
          There has never been a real-world OpenSSH exploit that allows a server to RCE a client that connected to it without a bunch of dubious qualifiers. Connecting to a random SSH server is much, much less dangerous than running a random binary or executing a random curl install script, both of which people do all the time, and is probably about on par with the likelihood of a random website escaping your browser's sandbox and RCEing you.
          1. soblemprolver · · focus · HN ↗
            I believe the recent cve-2026-55200 in libssh2 (client-side library) was allowing exactly this. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nvd.nist.gov&#x2F;vuln&#x2F;detail&#x2F;cve-2026-55200" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nvd.nist.gov&#x2F;vuln&#x2F;detail&#x2F;cve-2026-55200 (&quot;Remote attackers can send crafted SSH packets with excessively large packet_length values to corrupt heap memory and achieve remote code execution.&quot;)

            Of course the other abouts that you whatted (such as random curl install scripts, binaries, etc.) are still more dangerous.

            1. fulafel · · focus · HN ↗
              OpenSSH doesn&#x27;t use this library.
              1. soblemprolver · · focus · HN ↗
                Good to know, but OpenSSH is not the scope here.
                1. fulafel · · focus · HN ↗
                  It seems to me you were replying to refute a claim about OpenSSH.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.