‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Show HN: Elevators

1668 points · 413 comments · Jrh0203

  1. omoikane · · focus · HN ↗
    > Destination Dispatch [...] are in general worse

    I wonder if this is an artifact of how the author used random destinations. I worked in a building that used Destination Dispatch, and the common travel pattern seemed to be:

    - Everyone who is not on the ground floor generally want to go to the ground floor.

    - People who are on the ground floor generally travel in large groups to the same destination.

    This happens because people who worked on the same floor often leave for lunch at the same time, and return at the same time to the same floor. Destination Dispatch helps in this case because it's batching large groups of people with the same destination.

    1. ApolloFortyNine · · focus · HN ↗
      Surely there's a dataset out there with elevator calls for an office building you could test on, instead of the poor random destination case.

      Surprisingly, claude failed to find a good one.

      Also, part of destination dispatch (I'm guessing based on experience) removes the 'stopping on every floor problem', so the real test would be total time including wait at that point I think.

      1. Ekaros · · focus · HN ↗
        I think most of these sort of data sets are considered trade secrets. They are certainly recorded and even stored. But as they could give competitive edge between manufacturers they are not publicly shared. And access to them would mean building maintenance or managers giving access to their occupants information which some of the occupants would not like.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.