Misread the title and got excited about a Pareto font, that is, the best possible font (presumably: distinct l/I, O/0, scores within error margins of the top readability and reading speed scores, widely available, etc.)
Maybe in vein but did anyone already figure this one out? The closest I got was PT sans, open-licensed commissioned by the Russian ministry for communication (I found it surprising that a country that doesn't use Latin script made the best font!), but it's not widely shipped so you need to figure out how to include font files whenever you want to use it
I didn't know fonts can have options. Another learning curve on how to enable that in Latex/Html/Libreoffice/anywhere else I use fonts ^^'. But still helpful to know about!
ss02 disambiguation seems to be the one I'd be wanting to turn on, with tnum for monospace numbers being a good option as well that I hadn't even realised I wanted from a font!
That looks... swingy! Took a second to get used to it but I think I like the refreshing take for a monospace font :) <a href="https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Iosevka+Charon+Mono" rel="nofollow">https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Iosevka+Charon+Mono
No, it's far from the best possible font, but to its credit, it gets most aspects of typography right by just focusing on the ~1/5 of the requirements that actually really count.
What are the 4/5ths that you don't like, and which one(s) would you recommend instead? (I'm mostly interested/focussed on the sans variant but also happy to hear about serif and mono)
It's not that I don't like them. It's more just that some of these design considerations are not worth the effort to fret over, and if you're smart about your time, doing 1/5 of the work will get you something like ~4/5 of the results.
Huh, I'm positive this was one of the first I considered (or perhaps it was a different dyslexia font) but I can't find the reason why I would have preferred PT Sans over this. Each has some pros and cons: PT Sans has same-width digits; Hyperlegible has a nicer-looking Q (imo); PT Sans has a normal-looking zero (not struck); Hyperlegible has a normal-looking 'fi' combination (no ligature that merges the two characters into a new one); Hyperlegible has a 6 distinct from an inverted 9; PT Sans needs a bit less horizontal space. The font specifically designed for accessibility should be the easy winner if all else is equal anyway
They apparently released Hyperlegible Next in 2025 which, flipping between tabs on Google Fonts (since the original website doesn't show the fonts), is nearly identical but has five new weight settings (nobody should imo ever use thin fonts though, it noticeably harms readability for me and my sight is only the tiniest bit below normal vision, but ok it's an option) and improved kerning (the original font had extremely little space between 'll', for example)
The 2025 version sadly doesn't ship with my version of TexLive, but the original (from 2020) already does so that makes it easy to use as well! Cool stuff, thanks for the tip :)
Aachen · · focus · HN ↗
Maybe in vein but did anyone already figure this one out? The closest I got was PT sans, open-licensed commissioned by the Russian ministry for communication (I found it surprising that a country that doesn't use Latin script made the best font!), but it's not widely shipped so you need to figure out how to include font files whenever you want to use it
adornKey · · focus · HN ↗
joshka · · focus · HN ↗
airstrike · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://rsms.me/inter/" rel="nofollow">https://rsms.me/inter/
Aachen · · focus · HN ↗
ss02 disambiguation seems to be the one I'd be wanting to turn on, with tnum for monospace numbers being a good option as well that I hadn't even realised I wanted from a font!
airstrike · · focus · HN ↗
Tabular numbers are awesome!
notpushkin · · focus · HN ↗
airstrike · · focus · HN ↗
cheesecakegood · · focus · HN ↗
gadders · · focus · HN ↗
"The Pareto Front today claimed responsiblity for...."
orthoxerox · · focus · HN ↗
mdnahas · · focus · HN ↗
pphysch · · focus · HN ↗
[1] - <a href="http://montypython.50webs.com/scripts/Life_of_Brian/8.htm" rel="nofollow">http://montypython.50webs.com/scripts/Life_of_Brian/8.htm
lucaslazarus · · focus · HN ↗
croisillon · · focus · HN ↗
__s · · focus · HN ↗
Anyways I'll namedrop Iosevka as perfect monospace font for working on 13" laptop
throw-the-towel · · focus · HN ↗
Aachen · · focus · HN ↗
arduanika · · focus · HN ↗
Aachen · · focus · HN ↗
arduanika · · focus · HN ↗
notpushkin · · focus · HN ↗
peesem · · focus · HN ↗
Aachen · · focus · HN ↗
They apparently released Hyperlegible Next in 2025 which, flipping between tabs on Google Fonts (since the original website doesn't show the fonts), is nearly identical but has five new weight settings (nobody should imo ever use thin fonts though, it noticeably harms readability for me and my sight is only the tiniest bit below normal vision, but ok it's an option) and improved kerning (the original font had extremely little space between 'll', for example)
The 2025 version sadly doesn't ship with my version of TexLive, but the original (from 2020) already does so that makes it easy to use as well! Cool stuff, thanks for the tip :)